Lemme Lemme GLP-1
Lemme's GLP-1 product uses three branded botanical extracts and, unusually for this category, publishes the exact milligram amount and the standardisation percentage for each. The labelling is genuinely good. The evidence behind the ingredients is thinner than the labelling suggests.
Last reviewed · researched from the manufacturer’s published pages by Tom
What’s in it
Amounts are shown only where the manufacturer publishes them. Anything without a figure is undisclosed — and for an active ingredient, an undisclosed dose is the central problem with this category.
- Morosil Red Orange Fruit Extract (Citrus sinensis)400 mg
Standardised to 0.8% anthocyanins
- Eriomin Lemon Fruit Extract (Citrus limon)200 mg
Standardised to 70% eriocitrin
- Supresa Saffron Extract (Crocus sativus, stigma)176.5 mg
Standardised to 0.3% safranal
How the manufacturer says it works
Lemme positions the product around supporting the body's own GLP-1 pathway using three standardised botanical extracts, each a branded ingredient with supplier-sponsored research behind it.
What the evidence actually supports
All three are branded extracts with published studies attached. Eriocitrin has small trials examining glycaemic and inflammatory markers. Saffron extract has small trials on snacking behaviour and appetite. Red orange extract has small trials reporting effects on body weight and waist circumference. Publishing exact doses and standardisation percentages means you can at least compare what is in the capsule against the doses those studies used, which is more than most of this category permits.
Where that evidence stops
The trials behind branded botanical extracts are typically small, short, and funded by the ingredient supplier — an arrangement that consistently produces more favourable results than independent replication. None of these ingredients acts on the GLP-1 receptor, and none has evidence approaching the magnitude of the prescription medications the product name evokes. Good labelling is not the same as good evidence, and this product illustrates the difference clearly.
Strengths and problems
Strengths
- Publishes the exact milligram dose of all three actives — no proprietary blend
- Publishes the standardisation percentage for each extract, which is the specification that actually determines potency
- Uses branded extracts with at least some published human research rather than unstudied botanicals
- Enough label detail that you can compare doses against the published studies yourself
Problems
- The supporting studies are small, short and generally supplier-funded
- None of these ingredients acts on the GLP-1 receptor despite the product name
- No published trial of this three-ingredient combination
- Directions, warnings, allergens and refund terms were not published on the page we captured
- Saffron extract is among the more expensive botanical ingredients and price reflects that
What the manufacturer publishes
Publishes 2 of 8 standard terms.
- Intended use
- Sold as a daily dietary supplement positioned around GLP-1 support, not as a treatment for any condition.
- Directions
- Not publicly disclosed on the pages we captured.
- Warnings
- Not publicly disclosed on the pages we captured.
- Allergens
- Not publicly disclosed on the pages we captured.
- Third-party testing
- Not publicly disclosed on the pages we captured.
- Pricing
- From $30. Free shipping on orders over $50.
- Subscription
- Not publicly disclosed on the pages we captured.
- Refunds
- Not publicly disclosed on the pages we captured.
- Shipping
- States free shipping on orders over $50.
May suit
Someone who wants botanical appetite support and values being able to see and check every dose on the label.
Do not use if
- You are pregnant or breastfeeding — saffron is not recommended in pregnancy
- You take prescription medication without checking interactions first
Frequently asked
Is the labelling good or is the product good?
The labelling is genuinely good — full doses and standardisations, no proprietary blend. That is worth crediting and is rare. The evidence behind the ingredients is small, short-duration and mostly supplier-funded, which is a separate question. A well-labelled product with thin evidence is still better than a badly-labelled one, but it is not the same as a well-evidenced product.
Sources
Captured . Manufacturer pages change — check the current version before relying on anything.